Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 16th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely a copyvio--only source is "book cover", no idea what book or its copyright status —Justin (koavf)TCM 05:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Seen elsewhere in web at higher res. (Too bad this wasn't caught earlier - user's only upload.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing a source on English Wikipedia ("fair use image") Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (3,397 views, Sep 26 2017). Dispenser (talk) 02:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Niku2112 (talk) 04:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this deletion request is nonsense. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Capinogato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.instagram.com/leycang21/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huayamave Anabelle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photos with no apparent use. OOS

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source The author gave me permission to release it under public domain. Author Eva Brownstein" requires COM:OTRS Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Author Eva Brownstein must send a permission to OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@Gbawden: , This photo is not the claiming author's own work, it was downloaded from bdnews24.com (a popular Bangladeshi online news portal), I am not being able to give the reference as the page containing this photo has been broken/removed or deleted. Enthira Logathu (talk) 12:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found here https://freedombookfair.org/portfolio-item/bonya/ and needs OTRS per previous DR. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused chemical structure with some small SVG errors; superseded by File:Structural formula of butyl propionate.svg as corrected version with better file name. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 13:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a webhost + out of scope QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Remake of deleted content. Given final warning. --Achim (talk) 17:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Ahmed mohssen abumira (talk) 19:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Ahmed mohssen abumira (talk) 19:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Ahmed mohssen abumira (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Ahmed mohssen abumira (talk) 19:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not Ukrainian footballer ru:Рахаев, Игорь Владимирович. Unused photo about probably non-notable person, seems like out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I did not notice: the file is actually used. I withdraw the nomination. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Rocky Masum (talk) 18:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 04:37, 17 September 2019 UTC: per Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments in Bangladesh/Rules and FAQ#Non-eligible entries --Krdbot 07:17, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYRIGHT 212.225.226.52 18:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:22, 17 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Logo --Krdbot 13:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious mistake: should have been a Category-page Eissink (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 06:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a actrees (Saba Kamali) instagram page this is not own work by uploader لاکی لوک (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:SS. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a actrees (Saba Kamali) instagram page this is not own work by uploader لاکی لوک (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:SS. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan. this file is useless Humanist sam (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A recent photo with no Metadata EXIF. Seems not to own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Permission required. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A recent photo with no Metadata EXIF. Seems not to own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Permission required. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A recent photo with no Metadata EXIF. Seems not to own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Permission required. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A recent photo with no Metadata EXIF, but marked "Google". Seems not to own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Permission required. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A recent photo with no Metadata EXIF. Seems not to own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by NahidSultan at 20:04, 22 September 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused group selfie. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qolcomaq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files possibly from Facebook. Permission needed via OTRS.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I took these pictures myself on September 12, 2019. I took pictures with Huawei Y3 2017. I threw the photos into the messenger and uploaded them there.Qolcomaq (talk) 09:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Qolcomaq: Please send in more information to OTRS. Regards -- (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want, I can download original versions of the pictures. I just had to upload pictures to a messenger, not a computer, due to a problem with my computer.Qolcomaq (talk) 10:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete my older versions I download original versions. Thanks in advance.. Qolcomaq (talk) 10:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Original files required and/or Permission. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nightsmokingskull (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly from Facebook. Permission needed via OTRS

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Permission required. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:49, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nightsmokingskull (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Derivative work of copyrighted images. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable blurry image, near duplicate better alternative: File:Golden Mask of Tutankhamu00 (14).jpg P 1 9 9   14:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:55, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 02:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 16:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope + not a web host QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope + its not a encyclopedia QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope + not a web host QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a web host + out of scope QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope + self promotional QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope + self promotional/not a web host QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 00:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 03:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aledillon4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aledillon4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos that likely are not own work of the uploader, another image is watermarked with the URL "BANCOIMAGENES.CL" and an image appears to be a Google Street View screenshot.

Jespinos (talk) 00:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PCP. --Ezarateesteban 18:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE, not used, watermar (commercial?) 2001:A61:3430:F401:D10B:DF57:5E0D:F4CD 05:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Related to other deletion request Estopedist1 (talk) 06:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad/damaged file ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No purpose other than self promotion by uploader (In use in their en:w user page, which seems all self-promotion.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keop Creation 2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

CptViraj (📧) 09:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 09:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious copyright holder Mutter Erde (talk) 09:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious copyright holder Mutter Erde (talk) 09:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old logo no more in use 193.136.113.72 09:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shaky. Near duplicate of File:201909 ystradgynlais bridge 2.jpg, same subject, same photographer, same day Andy Dingley (talk) 10:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be the subject. (which would require OTRS anyway) According to https://skienbibliotek.no/ossietzkyprisen-2018-til-skiens-fribyforfatter-tutul/ the photographer is Arne Olav Hageberg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: The upload here actually seems to predate skienbibliotek.no. But that doesn't take away any of the other arguments. I guess the uploader just might be (a representative of) Ahmedur Rashid Chowdhury, but we need permission from Arne Olav Hageberg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weil died in 1977, so photos in 2011 and 2013 are unlikely. Also low resolution, posed, monochrome, all factors arguing against "own work".

GRuban (talk) 13:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EileenSa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

cf com:PENIS

Pippobuono (talk) 13:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EileenSa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly used for self promo on fa.wiki (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the wrong HOUSE picture. I uploaded correct house picture today. under catlin court (I own the ware house-I found this error) THIS picture is the house located at 7146 N. 58 DRIVE Cmglendale (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, rename and replace in Wikipedia with correct image. This is still a useful image of a building in a historic area. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. rename the image with it's proper name: The "Bears and More" house. This structure is a contributing structure in the historic district which is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Marine 69-71 (talk) 19:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note I searched and could not find the image which the nominator claims to have uploaded. Marine 69-71 (talk) 19:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC) Never mind, I found the image, I guess non of us is free of making mistakes :-D. Marine 69-71 (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: personal file of user without other contribution Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already deleted, uploaded again Estopedist1 (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensive 2.235.159.92 15:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Sono il ragazzo nella foto che sta legando, chiedo cortesemente che venga rimossa la foto per questioni legate al mio attuale lavoro. 151.75.158.203 15:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

not suitable, from my company they asked me to remove it because it is not very professional 151.75.158.203 15:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jisa39 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This gallery of images has a single subject: a museum and its workers. However the other unifying feature, the "own work" claimed for each of these pictures is obviously incorrect. The images range in date from the 1930s to the present, have multiple cameras, some appear to have been previously published, and multiple images were sent to speedy during this same check. Other images remaining may also be COM:COPYVIOs, but this group is the obvious gallery of "similar images". The only illustration here is a paleo reconstruction (claimed as own work) which obviously isn't.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jisa39 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© Servicio Nacional del Patrimonio Cultural

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:PACKAGING — Racconish💬 16:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:PACKAGING — Racconish💬 16:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work Mutter Erde (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; by Ted Allan, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is Luciana Giacomelli. there is no source she released the image with that license Yilku1 (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is Luciana Giacomelli. there is no source she released the image with that license Yilku1 (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it says the author is FOTO JONYY not Franco, there is no source he released the image with that license Yilku1 (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete Irshadsalarzai75 (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 21:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, not within Commons scope. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 06:37, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 04:16, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Small photo without metadata, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - I agree with the nominator. Delete, just like the other files of him are already deleted.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 12:27, 23 September 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jisa39 --Krdbot 19:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Dw no source since (dw no source since) SVTCobra 16:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I challenge the standard process Derivative Work deletion (dw no source) of this item by @A1Cafel: . This is, as far as I can tell, an original water painting by w:User:Amandajm (whom I will notify for comment). If this is derivative (image within an image), it behooves the nominator to state what it is derivative of. If it is supposed to be derivative of a generic w:Golliwog I am sure it is PD-Expired (see File:Golliwogg1.jpg). Even photographs of dolls like Category:Barbie dolls seem to be eligible for Commons even though they not artistic and under current copyright protection. The only way I can see GeorgieandWolly.JPG eligible for deletion is if it was a free-hand copy of another copyrighted work the existence of which must be proved. --SVTCobra 16:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Artwork is original. Child is the niece of the artist. Wolly was made by the artist, as one of many soft toys made as gifts for children during the 1960s-1990s.
The golliwog in the image is not taken directly from any particular such toy, painted or sewn by any other artist. It is essentially a generic gollywog, in the same way as a teddy bear is a teddy bear.
Amandajm (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per the statement by User:Amandajm. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Gerhard Haubold 10:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - publicity photo from his Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/andreiionitacello/Mahāgaja · talk 20:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Immortalhazarus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Movie stills: copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Immortalhazarus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Yukiko Okada em 4-4-1986.png

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie still: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : La photo appartient au club du Biarritz olympique. Sauf autorisation ou preuve de licence libre, c'est une violation des droits d'auteurs : https://www.bo-pb.com/saison/equipe
English: non free-licence, copyvio from https://www.bo-pb.com/saison/equipe
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 20:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we think the draft about this gentleman will come to a good end, any notability? (I mean Commonswise. ) E4024 (talk) 13:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use at this time, so within scope; if article deleted, then we can review.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use anymore, see previous deletion request. Also no permission Estopedist1 (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:PACKAGING

— Racconish💬 16:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original bottles protected in France by copyright

— Racconish💬 19:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The gallery which owns this painting has not given permission for their photo of the painting to be used in wikicommons. Cynthia Wing (talk) 19:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete: While Commons doesn't recognise any independent copyright in the photo of the painting (see {{PD-art}}), there's no explanation of why the original painting is in the public domain in the United States. --bjh21 (talk) 10:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki Melquíades (talk) 19:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Mio2380

[edit]
  1. File:(SMS) Moje Notifikácie 200x170 (Logo portrét).svg
  2. File:(SMS) Moje Notifikácie 200x170 (Logo portrét).svg
  3. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x70 (Logo horizontálne).svg
  4. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x70 (Logo horizontálne).svg
  5. File:(SMS) Moje Notifikácie 200x170 (Logo portrét).svg
  6. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x70 (Logo horizontálne).svg
  7. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner url).svg
  8. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner url).svg
  9. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner text url).svg
  10. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner text url).svg
  11. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner text B).svg
  12. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner text B).svg
  13. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text url B).svg
  14. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text url B).svg
  15. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text tlačidlo A).svg
  16. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text tlačidlo A).svg
  17. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner tlačidlo).svg
  18. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner tlačidlo).svg
  19. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner tlačidlo).svg
  20. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Logo tlačidlo).svg
  21. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Logo tlačidlo).svg
  22. File:(SMS) Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner tlačidlo).svg
  23. File:(SMS) Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner tlačidlo).svg
  24. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text A).svg
  25. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text A).svg
  26. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Logo).svg
  27. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Logo).svg
  28. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x120 (Tlačidlo).svg
  29. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x120 (Tlačidlo).svg
  30. File:Moje Notifikácie 100x100 (Symbol).svg
  31. File:Moje Notifikácie 100x100 (Symbol).svg
  32. File:Moje Notifikácie 100x100 (Logo).svg
  33. File:Moje Notifikácie 100x100 (Logo).svg
  34. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Logo tlačidlo).svg
  35. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Logo).svg
  36. File:Moje Notifikácie 100x100 (Logo).svg
  37. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner url).svg
  38. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner text B).svg
  39. File:Moje Notifikácie 300x300 (Banner text url).svg
  40. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text url B).svg
  41. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text tlačidlo A).svg
  42. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner tlačidlo).svg
  43. File:(SMS) Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner tlačidlo).svg
  44. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x200 (Banner text A).svg
  45. File:Moje Notifikácie 200x120 (Tlačidlo).svg
  46. File:Moje Notifikácie 100x100 (Symbol).svg

not used files, invalid categorizing. Seems like advertisement --Estopedist1 (talk) 15:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These images are "confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0." as they were from Flickr and were reviewed by FlickreviewR. There is nothing wrong from what I'm aware. Iggy the Swan (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - The images may be freely licensed, but there is no evidence that the sculptor has licensed his work. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not an external host for particracy wiki Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal and fictitious flag proposal, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:46, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a bad quality photo out of focus. Pierre cb (talk) 03:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Extremely blurry, no location, not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

 Keep Freedom of panorama for 2D and 3D artwork in Germany. The objects shown in the picture are not DW so the FoP must be applied. --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Also the second one, as German FoP applies only to "works located permanently in public streets, ways, or public open spaces"; this work was displayed only temporarily, and not in a public space. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake diagram, unused file, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake diagram, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Logo of unknown restaurant. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication why a drawing by Tolkien could become CC licensed. FunkMonk (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons is not an external hosting tool for reddit's "model House of Commons" Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Just another of those parliament diagram tool test / fake uploads. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free university logo Larryasou (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free university logo Larryasou (talk) 11:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free university logo Larryasou (talk) 11:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload error O3Klemen (talk) 10:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein own work, sondern laut Einbindung von Beth Phillips Schnabeltassentier (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person is not ru:Шевченко, Юрий Николаевич. Unused photo about non-notable person, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a recent installation and thereby still in copyright. Regrettably, freedom-of-panorama exception in ths U.S. does not cover such works (only buildings). Therefore, a permission by the sculptor is required or this image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio? The source is probably not right. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NUS logo is fair use. The school was only founded 39 years ago as NUS. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no country stated, fake diagram, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong data, fake diagram ; out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong data, fake diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source, dubious licence Mutter Erde (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio logo from https://www.cals.nl Verdel (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed. Replaced by a more generalised template. Bodhisattwa (talk) 04:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazines scans: copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Has no authority to release these articles under a free license. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS confirmation needed. Files do not have any metadata and uploader might not be the subject herself.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammadamin rt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, small size, user upload history (proven copyvio upload).

4nn1l2 (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je n'ai pas les droits de cette image Carinou (talk) 06:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je n'ai pas les droits de cette image Carinou (talk) 06:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je n'ai pas les droits de cette image Carinou (talk) 06:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of ownership or permission to release; image is unavailable under the specified license. Copyright belongs to the Arakan Army. CentreLeftRight 07:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by author. - Joxemai (talk) 08:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   20:14, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by author (Out of use). - Joxemai - Joxemai (talk) 07:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hrishi wayangankar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS personal photos. en.wiki article speedied and when uploader's requested for undeletion, it was rejected.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

furthermore, if uploader is the subject, it can't be his own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 07:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see COM:PACKAGING A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see COM:PACKAGING A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, no links to this image, structure of this compound available in better quality: Image:Ethacridine lactate Structural formula V2.svg Mixtures (talk) 06:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete incorrect structure (should be lactate anion), not used, low quality. Wostr (talk) 22:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ferreirashelena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not useful and probably not free

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Virtual diagram of an election that did not take place, with non-existing parties. Another fake diagram in this category Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used anymore, duplicates with Meeting 1er mai 2012 Front National, Paris (8) - cropped.jpg Cheep (talk) 18:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already used on the web. Another version of the same photo in 2017 [1]. Permission needed. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP; needs OTRS from ŁOWIGUS Artur per exif. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Franck Scurti is born in 1965. No freedom of panorama in france. 86.249.247.229 21:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Franck Scurti is born in 1965. No freedom of panorama in france. 86.249.247.229 21:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D artworks in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from a video under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence. NC is not compatible with Commons rules. Shev123 (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake diagram, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless test diagram, c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubts regarding the authorship of the uploader, as color version of this image is at stockphoto agency[2] and was published earlier[3] than claimed here. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small image. Better is File:Sambasowiki.jpg, although this is no permission image Estopedist1 (talk) 14:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the prominent pixels, this appears to be fairly obviously a photo taken of a television. Would need reason to believe that whatever program this was taken of is itself covered under a free license. GMGtalk 15:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contest I wouldn't have bothered to contest this deletion proposals had it not been that this photo was not captured from a television as assumed rather, it was originally captured by my Itel it2190 mobile phone camera but I didn't like the appearance and there was no electricity for me to initially use my Tecno F1 so I had to wait until I could use my Tecno F1 which became possible when I couldn't capture the scene with the Tecno F1 directly because I am an aspirant for University admission and so don't have the freedom or resources that I need so I recaptured the same scene from my Itel it2190 screen using my Tecno F1 which is why it seems as if I captured it from a television screen. Am sure no human owns the copyright to a lake or river itself though it is possible to own the copyright to a photo or artwork of a lake or river. I assume I can go to a lake, take up my camera an capture it and I don't think Wikimedia has any objections to one capturing a scene from it's own phone camera and recapture the image in the screen of its own phone as Captured by the camera of it's own phone. The file shouldn't be deleted because someone assumes that I captured it from a television screen. {Crraro (talk) 15:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)}[reply]

@Crraro: If you have the original photograph, then you should upload the original photograph, if for no other reason then that taking a photograph of an LED screen in this way degrades the quality to the point that it's not clear the photo is even realistically usable. GMGtalk 16:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted by me to regular DR, as IMO this street scene is rather in COM:SCOPE, independant of the uploader's intentions. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs permissionl; found on https://ruanfeeatry.negocio.site/. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On request of the creator Nathan A RF (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted video game screens or artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Photos like File:Tokyo Game Show 2015 (21159552564).jpg IMO are DeMinimis already. In any case, all of them can be cropped to remove the focus in the copyrighted parts, and turn eventual copyrightable elements still there also DeMinimis. I can do that myself, as time allows.-- Darwin Ahoy! 11:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I see no way that any of these can be cropped to remove all the copyrighted material while retaining a useful image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

上传版本出错,作者请求删除,删除后重新上传 Tyg728 (talk) 12:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 作者请求删除,原因:版权属于他人
Converted by me to regular DR, as this uploader-request - 2 years after upload - requires a discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The image is 2700x1800, has EXIF, and does not show up in a Google search except as a Commons image. It is used on half a dozen WPs, so cannot be deleted without better evidence of a copyvio. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DR: Non-free book covers/posters. CptViraj (📧) 08:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Mostly simple text which falls below COM:TOO; most photos too small to fail COM:DM. Possible exception is the top one, which could be blurred. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- copyvio as noted, also probably out of scope -- not useful. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made-up results and non-existing parties for elections that never occurred are out of project scope. c:File:My Parliament.svg is available for testing Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake diagram, Commons is not an external hosting tool for nationstates.net Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake diagram, Commons is not an external hosting tool for nationstates.net Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lean towards delete, but clarification requested: I think that there is no issue with removing imaginary legislative diagrams if they are not being used on a Wikimedia project, but I wish to ask for a clarification on how this will not affect people like me, who use personal flags on Wikimedia projects. I ask this, because there was an incident in 2015 where a user launched a wave of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, and I am concerned that it may unintentionally cause a chilling effect on people who upload special or fictional flags that are appropriately categorised and clearly inoffensive. If you have any questions, please reply here. --Minoa (talk) 13:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 09:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is used in dark skin for Wikipedia but for technical reasons you can't see it in Wikimedia Commons Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 10:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unused, no categories. Without categories an image is simply lost among our 56 million images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - derivative of a copyrighted painting/sculpture, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 11:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Serial souvenirs are not works of art and are not special paintings or sculptures. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.39.213.20 (talk) 05:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@84.39.213.20: are you sure they are not protected? Slovene copyright law only excludes folk art from protected intellectual creations. Are there any other case law that would lead to this conclusion? — Yerpo Eh? 11:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Serial works are certainly protected by copyright everywhere. There is no reason to believe that somehow souvenirs are exempt. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:24, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Victor Victori artwork with unclear licenses 2

[edit]

Victor Victori artwork uploaded as CC. However, not CC-eligible nor PD, as Victori is still alive. --Kissa21782 (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is possible that the uploader is the artist and not simply a fan using the artist's name. If that is the case, it must be proven using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the description here, this is a photographic self-portrait from about 1930. Fortuny died in 1949, so this is presumably under copyright until 2020. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:28, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Picture​ on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 09:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 15:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The duplicate file with but I want to delete it because it's my own work. Mongolia44 18:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 15:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 15:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. SVG. File ​ มองโกเลีย๔๔ 12:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


Kept: per previous. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 15:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DDupard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

BNF interpretation that all parts of a magazine are to be considered as collective work is not accepted on Commons, in view of the sheer nature of collective works in France. Furthermore, these advertisments cannot be considered as part of the publication's collective work, they are separate works. We need more specific evidence they are in the public domain.

— Racconish💬 16:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same information as upload by nominator Racconish : File:Pour Un Homme , Parfum de Caron - Vogue, January 1934.jpg???.--DDupard (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I had forgotten this one . — Racconish💬 16:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So what or which more "specific evidence" is requested?--DDupard (talk) 16:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In any case it is {{PD-US-no notice advertisement}} and
Bibliothèque nationale de France
probably knows what it does and says when downloads are allowed and clearly marked public domain  Keep--DDupard (talk) 16:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
{{PD-US-no notice advertisement}} does not apply here. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Baionnette 2 December 1915.png for a long discussion of why we cannot accept BNF blanket position that any part of a newspaper published more than 70 years ago is a collective work. In a nutshell: the French legal definition of collective work is restrictive and does not apply to a signed article, a signed artwork or an external production such as an advertisement. — Racconish💬 18:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As already mentioned : Not signed/Author unknown. Will read your exchanges later, link should have explicitly been given earlier - instead of obscure hints and guess work for recipient.--DDupard (talk) 18:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Baionnette 2 December 1915.png seems to consider rights of a signed caricature drawing by an artist of some notability.--DDupard (talk) 10:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A work does not have to be signed to be entitled to copyright protection. — Racconish💬 12:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So please enlighten me, where is it specified who is the copyrights holder for this document, in this instance, marked Public domain. And please also state clear-cut and understandable reference literature.--DDupard (talk) 19:03, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You are reverting the burden of proof: it is up to you to show evidence of a reasonable enquiry, i.e. the research you have carried out to find who the author was, such as for example specialized monographies (e. g. Colard, Cardot or Monsen and Baer, cited here) saying the author is unknown. BNF's blanket assessment is not sufficient. — Racconish💬 08:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Question presented to 'Legifer' on WP.fr, answer given with specific links to 'Legifrance' - law articles :[4].--DDupard (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In French copyright law (art. L. 121-1) as well as in the Berne convention (art. 6bis), the right for the author to divulgate his paternity of the work is a moral right with no time limitation. The point here is to establish evidence of your enquiry on the authorship of these specific works. — Racconish💬 15:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Racconish could you please give an example of "evidence of inquiry" established. --DDupard (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Explicit reference to some of the three sources I mentioned above, Colard, Cardot or Monsen and Baer. — Racconish💬 20:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Racconish, I still don't understand what is expected. Should these authors in these books state that these very images were created by people whose name is unknown?--DDupard (talk) 06:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, or something else to the same effect. — Racconish💬 07:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the books mentioned in the article ‘Parfums Caron ‘ focus on the bottles [5] - glass and glassware. As far as advertising is concerned, this lovely one [6] seems to be part of a museum collection and that one for 'Royal bain' [7] seems to be from an unknown artist ; As you can see, both images on these sites are of much greater quality than the Bnf scans. (incidentally, I also see that there is something called PD-Scan)

I also read that department store advertising in early twentieth century usually relied on an in house team of young art students.

Otherwise a generic image search brings this: [8], and in my reply on September 16 [9], I indicated, that a selection had been made.--DDupard (talk) 13:49, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't this be an illustration of being more Catholic than the Pope himself?--DDupard (talk) 09:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Since you asked for a third opinion here, I remind you there is a consensus to consider we cannot follow blindly BnF's assessment. It seems you consider yourself these works may be from Marcel Moore or Claude Cahun, whose works are not PD [10]. In any case we should apply COM:PCP.— Racconish💬 09:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As I am not far from the BNF library, I am going to go on site and check what the precise and specific status on these images is in 2019. I have never spoken of 'not PD', on the contrary, I offered a possible hypothesis, in which I also advanced that for respectability reasons, these images might have been published anonymously, thus being voluntarily excluded of copyrights. Hypothesis that I am going to check as well. --DDupard (talk) 12:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Racconish, in the book Caron by Jean Marie Martin-Hattemberg consulted on site at the Caron Store on Place Beauveau, I find that photos were usually taken by Ernest Daltroff' brother Raoul, this one [11] in particular, and that drawings were made in house by Ternat, Paul [12], otherwise nothing at Bnf-Richelieu--DDupard (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Raoul Daltroff likely died in 1920 [13] and his involvment on a 1926 creation is therefore unlikely. The two creative heads of Caron were then Félicie Wampouille (died 1967) and Paul Ternat (died 1951), the latter working under the former. If we have a source attributing a creative work to the sole Ternat, then it would fall in the public domain in 2022 ; otherwise, per COM:PCP, we should assume Wampouille was involved and the PD year would be 2038. For further clarification, it might be useful to check Martin-Hattemberg's book on Caron which seems to be the source used on Museu del perfum. — Racconish💬 08:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of packaging — Racconish💬 16:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Racconish any evidence ?--DDupard (talk) 18:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Here. — Racconish💬 18:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Where? I don't see the very file.--DDupard (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On request of the creator Nathan A RF (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a derivative crop of File:NotaGil-ArturoGilardoni.jpg, which is missing permission. GMGtalk 12:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS of source is confirmed. --JuTa 13:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted signboard. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I redacted the illustration.  Keep the new version,  Delete the old version. whym (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There is enough text remaining to have a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR discussion: no copyrighted text here and image was used. Ankry (talk) 08:30, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque esta dañado Luis enrique mata hernandez (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The user page was deleted by Tulsi Bhagat. We do not delete user talk pages as they are an important, accessible record of a user's activities here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misrepresentation of me (Violeta Tomič) Fenikssonce (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fenikssonce, is this nomination because of the Venezuelan sash? Not a misrepresentation at all, Tomič's political party Levica was strongly connected to Venezuelan socialistic government, see this photo in front of their embassy (Tomič is in the middle of the group) or this and this. MZaplotnik(talk) 21:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, so incorrect licence. Source missing. Tekstman (talk) 19:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Issue now resolved. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's a screenshot 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's a screenshot 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's a screenshot 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's a screenshot 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot is not cc-by-sa 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same like File:Bildschirmfoto 2016-07-14 um 19.15.19.png , screenshot is not cc-by-sa 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:36, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's a screenshot 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is really just an inferior duplicate of File:North view of 4th Ave from Cherry St showing regrade activities, Seattle, Washington, 1906 (LEE 227).jpeg. I've had an email exchange with University of Washington Libraries; they see it that way, too, and rather than correct the date of this on their site, they just plan to delete it as a duplicate. I know that normally we don't delete "inexact" duplicates and this is a different (decidedly inferior) print, but I don't think there is really any point to keeping it under the circumstances: I think it should just become a redirect to the other. Jmabel ! talk 22:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

他者のアカウント情報がファイル名に含まれているため、その方へ影響が出ている。 Yuuyaun (talk) 07:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

他者の名前がファイル名に表示されているため、その方に影響が出ている。 Yuuyaun (talk) 07:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's a screenshot from YouTube from minute 26:30 or later 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I disagree. In that section of video, there's a grey and green building behind the speaker and the woman in the red jacket is in line with the speaker's book. In this photo, the background is black and the woman in the red jacket is well below and to the right of the book. If you look at the video from 27:24 onwards you can see a photographer crouching at the side of the stage below the TV camera: I think this photo may have been taken by that photographer. --bjh21 (talk) 10:23, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A Wikipedia photographer with such equipment would hardly have taken pictures of only one participant of this event and then set them in a relatively small resolution in a file format that is rather unsuitable for photos. --2003:DE:734:8D47:6090:3554:F40D:5BBB 16:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyvio considering the lack of EXIF data and the uploader's history. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's a screenshot from YouTube from minute 26:30 or later 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I disagree. In that section of video, there are people and a building visible behind the speaker. In this photo, the background is black. If you look at the video from 27:24 onwards you can see a photographer crouching at the side of the stage below the TV camera: I think this photo may have been taken by that photographer. --bjh21 (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A Wikipedia photographer with such equipment would hardly have taken pictures of only one participant of this event and then set them in a relatively small resolution in a file format that is rather unsuitable for photos. --2003:DE:734:8D47:6090:3554:F40D:5BBB 16:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: now a broken redirect. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's a screenshot from YouTube from minute 26:30 or later 2003:DE:734:8DE4:3012:2DA4:8D97:938D 19:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I disagree. In that section of video, there are people and a building visible behind the speaker. In this photo, the background is black. If you look at the video from 27:24 onwards you can see a photographer crouching at the side of the stage below the TV camera: I think this photo may have been taken by that photographer. --bjh21 (talk) 10:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A Wikipedia photographer with such equipment would hardly have taken pictures of only one participant of this event and then set them in a relatively small resolution in a file format that is rather unsuitable for photos. --2003:DE:734:8D47:6090:3554:F40D:5BBB 16:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: while the photo is not from the video, considering the lack of EXIF data, and the uploader's upload history I suspect a copyright violation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the photographer. The permission in ticket #2018101910005658 is given by one person but was sent by someone with a quite different name; it is not remotely likely that either one of them took the photograph. Ping דוג'רית, who handled the ticket. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]