User talk:Mu/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Théâtre de la Gaîté

Hello Mu, You've taken some nice photos of Paris. I was particularly pleased that you took this one of the Palais-Royal across from the place de Valois. I don't know whether you are open to suggestions for subjects, but we certainly could use a nice photo of the facade of the en:Théâtre de la Gaîté (aka, Gaîté-Lyrique). I suspect this one is copyrighted; likewise this view on Google Maps; and this one at the website of the Mairie de Paris. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for offering to do this, and good luck with the weather (and the tarp)! I think I read somewhere that the facade is supposed to very much as it was in 1862. --Robert.Allen (talk) 02:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Théâtre de la Gaîté
Wow! Fast work! It looks like the city cleaned up the facade nicely. If I were to select one, it would be a full facade, and I really liked the angle and composition of this one. (And the fence. It looks as though no matter from where you take it, there are going to be things, especially trees, in the way. We're lucky the leaves are off the trees. The detail pic with the name is nice. It would complement the long shot. Please add your choice(s) to the articles.) Thanks for taking them! [BTW, what does FOP stand for?] --Robert.Allen (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I find the photos better than you do, I guess. Even if you're not totally happy with them, they are certainly more than good enough to use. I will glad to try to add them to the English article. I haven't looked into FOP yet, but I guess it applies to buildings designed by architects who are still living or only died fewer than 70 years ago. BTW, a night shot sounds very interesting. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I like your gallery, and the shot of the statue is great. I have a a rewrite of the English article in progress. I hope to finish it soon. We're making some good progress.... --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Théâtre de Nicolet

I created Category:Théâtre de Nicolet as a subcategory of Category:Théâtre de la Gaîté on the fly while adding additional pics for en:Théâtre de la Gaîté. Now I am having second thoughts. Perhaps it would be better named Category:Théâtre de la Gaîté (boulevard du Temple). (Category:Théâtre de Nicolet would become a redirect to the new name.) In this scenario File:Théâtre de la Gaîté (boulevard du Temple) 1835–1862 - Pougin 1885 p115.jpg would be moved to the subcategory. I think this would be a better organization for the files. Do you have any thoughts on this? Thanks! --Robert.Allen (talk) 09:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

French...

[1][2]: I don't entirely disagree with these edits, but it would seem that some other category should be added to maintain a connection to French cuisine. - Jmabel ! talk 20:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I take your point. I have two suggestions: Category:French bakeries in the United States as a subcat of Category:Bakeries in the United States, and/or Category:French culture in the United States as a subcat of both Category:French culture and Category:Culture of the United States (in parallel with Category:Chinese culture in the United States). But there could well be other and better ideas... – Mu (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I think both are good ideas, with the bakeries category as a subcat of the culture category. Another subcat would be Category:Bastille Day celebrations in the United States. - Jmabel ! talk 17:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


File:Benjamin Britten 1945.jpg

How do you know the author died 70 years ago?Geni (talk) 11:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Mu, it seems that the name of the picture is erroneous. According to detailed information in http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b7722352h.item.f3 it was taken ca. 1926, i.e. in the time when Tansman was married to Anna, not to Colette, who was his second wife. Could you please rename the picture? Regards, Michał Sobkowski (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Benjamin Britten 1945.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Jappalang (talk) 01:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Benjamin_Britten_1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jappalang (talk) 13:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Nadia_Boulanger_1966.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OxIxO (talk) 14:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Étienne Fessard has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


A. Wagner (talk) 19:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Mu!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Samuel_Rousseau_by_Henri_Manuel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.61.171.219 20:22, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Paris and the Spanish language

Hi! One thing I noticed is that the municipality of Paris posts announcements in Spanish (in addition to English and French), so apparently Spanish is also an important language in the city. So in some Paris-related categories and images I started adding Spanish names.

Do you know a little bit of Spanish? Would you be interested in adding Spanish translations to Paris-related media and categories too? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 07:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Paname, toujours

Hello,
Alors, toujours sur la brèche, je vois... J'ai bien aimé faire cette photo de la porte et du boulevard saint-Martin, au même endroit qu'un photographe a fait une photo en 1871 après les incendies de la Commune. On reconnait parfaitement les immeubles derrière la porte. Par contre, ceux à droite de la photo, comme je l'ai expliqué dans la description on été totalement reconstruits.
J'ai du être perturbé et j'ai foiré sur les catégories, mais tu as corrigé avant même que je réponde au bot. A part ca, boulevard saint martin, j'avais fait la même photo que toi d'une plaque de la Libération. Mais j'ai fait une jolie photo originale de céramiques représentant deux femmes. A part ca, j'ai fait des photos de Capbreton dans les Landes, de Strasbourg, de Tournus en Saône-et-Loire. Vivement l'été pour refaire des photos à Paris en journée. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

PS : WhisperToMe est le wikipedien US qui m'a demandé de faire des photos des sièges de sociétés du CAC40, puis de sociétés plus petites. J'en ai fait pas mal, beaucoup sont récents et j'ai du les charger sur les wikipedia us et fr en fair use. Je ne regrette pas, j'ai vu des trucs intéressants. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Catégorisation

Bonjour Mu,
Comme je vois que tu t'occupe beaucoup du nettoyage des overcat, j'ai une question à te poser, espérant que tu pourras me répondre. Il y a beaucoup d'images dans commons répertoriées par plusieurs catégories, par exemple les FOOTBRIDGES in France sont répertoriés par département, mais ils peuvent être aussi par date, par type, par architecte, etc. Si on ne connait pas le département dans lequel se trouve une passerelle qui nous intéresse, répertorier toutes les passerelles par département en enlevant une attache à la catégorie mère donc FOOTBRIDGES in France obligera de balayer tous les départements pour la trouver. Une possibilité de voir toutes les images en vrac des toutes les sous-catégories à n'importe quel niveau me paraît nécessaire. Sans avoir une répétition des images à tous les niveaux, le seul moyen que je connais et de poser une template Template:Catscan gallery à chaque niveau dans les catégories sauf la dernière. Mais cette template n'est pas facile en utilisation. Que-est ce que tu propose d'autre pour résoudre ce problème? Bien à toi, --Moonik (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Moonik et merci pour ton message. Il est vrai que la question de la catégorisation est délicate et nous sommes sans doute loin encore d'avoir trouvé la formule idéale. Cela dit, concernant le problème que tu soulèves, et en regardant ce que tu as fait pour Category:Footbridges in France, je pense que la solution que tu as trouvée, même si elle peut paraître un peu lourde, est très intéressante. En tout cas, je n'en connais pas de meilleure. L'as-tu utilisée pour d'autres catégories et as-tu eu du feedback d'autres contributeurs ?
Au passage, félicitations pour ton français !
Cordialement, Mu (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Merci pour ta réponse rapide. La classification a été toujours un grand souci des documentalistes et un sujet pas facile. Je pense que Wiki s’en sort pas mal malgré la faiblesse de son moteur de recherche. La template en question, j’ai trouvé sur une des pages de commons, mais je n’ai pas de retour sur son utilisation. Je vais essayer de généraliser son emploi sur d’autres pages de catégories du Commons et on verra le feedbacks. Bon wiki-travail et bien cordialement --Moonik (talk) 11:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Déodat de Séverac by Georges Gimel 1921.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--MGuf (d) 18:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Rues de Paris

Bonjour Mu,

Merci pour toutes tes interventions relatives à la catégorisation précise d'images de rues de Paris. Bonne journée, --Mbzt (talk) 07:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


File:Tombeau Marechal Foch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


File:Leonetto Cappiello - Pâtes Ferrari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

howcheng {chat} 20:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


File:Aladdin 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 01:55, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Scheherazade 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 01:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wuzur 13:39, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Karl Buresch 1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 17:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Why did you delete most of the categories on this photo?

"File:PhilKonstantinByPhilKonstantin.jpg"

Philkon (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Phil Konstantin

Category discussion warning

Horse-drawn trams in Paris has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


-- Tuválkin 06:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Plaque Porte Saint-Honoré - Jeanne d'Arc, 163 rue Saint-Honoré, Paris 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.6.97 20:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tombe Coluche, Cimetière de Montrouge (4).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tombe Coluche, Cimetière de Montrouge (4).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bapti 15:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Bapti. Je m'aperçois qu'un anonyme a écrasé avec ce dessin (File:Tombe Coluche, Cimetière de Montrouge (4).jpg) une photographie parmi la série que j'avais prise de la tombe de Coluche. Ce qui est embêtant, c'est que ce dessin, qui a sans doute été piqué quelque part sur le web, figure actuellement dans plusieurs Wikipédias. En le supprimant, il faudra donc veiller à ce qu'il ne soit pas automatiquement remplacé par la photographie originelle, que je n'avais prise qu'à titre documentaire, et dont la qualité est trop mauvaise pour servir de portrait de Coluche. Cela dit, ça ne serait pas une tragédie pour moi si cette photographie devait disparaître en même temps que le dessin. — Mu (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Mu,
Il y a de toute façon deux problèmes avec ces images :
Concernant l'actuelle, on ne sait pas d'où elle vient, mais son allure fait penser à un copier/coller sur Internet.
Concernant ta version, c'est une œuvre dérivée. À moins que tu sois l'auteur de l'œuvre que tu as pris en photo, il n'est pas possible de l'utiliser sur Wikipédia. Le cas des autres photos de la série, comme File:Tombe Coluche, Cimetière de Montrouge (2).jpg est moins problématique car il est possible d'invoquer De minimis (la photo n'est qu'un élement de ton cliché, pas le centre de ton document). C'est effectivement dommage de perdre une double illustration mais il faut bien respecter les droits d'auteurs ^^--Bapti 14:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
File:René d'Anjou by Francesco Laurana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 09:52, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Albert Lebrun 1932 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 06:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)


Category discussion warning

André Marcel Baschet has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Favonian (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gogoan.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gogoan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gogoan.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 09:42, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Statue Horace Wells, place des États-Unis, Paris, 1910.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 23:30, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Servandoni's house

Bonjour Mu,
Giovanni Niccolò Servandoni's house on Place Saint-Sulpice still stands [3]. It is the only part of his design for the square that was executed. Trees block the view, so like the Gaîté, now is a good time to try to get a photo. Would you be interested in trying to take some? Best regards! --Robert.Allen (talk) 19:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 09:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Augusto Rosso 1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Svnnsmsn (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)


File:Stanley Baldwin 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DrKiernan (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Plaque Bataille de Narvik, 6 place de Narvik, Paris 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

The photograph of Louis Puissant

File:Louis Puissant.jpg
Louis Puissant

I doubt whether the photograph Louis Puissant is of the geographer (1769-1847). Please see the discussion page for this image. cffk (talk) 22:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Louis Puissant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

cffk (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Abraham Louis Breguet 02.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Abraham Louis Breguet 02.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 12:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Sergey Merkurov and his Tolstoy 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 10:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sergey Merkurov and his Tolstoy 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 10:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Paul Claudel 1928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dereckson (talk) 18:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Colette 1932 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dereckson (talk) 18:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 14:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Melchior de Polignac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 09:50, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Plaque Édouard Goerg, 111 rue de Longchamp, Paris 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.61.233.67 00:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Using picture is not being shown …

Hello, on http://www.magazin-restkultur.de/restfakten/ we had use this picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AAlfred_Pritchard_Sloan_1937.jpg

In the use-commnons-field doesn't appear the link to.

It's only an imformation we want to submit.

Thank you very much

Miguel Escosa Jung | info@magazin-restkultur.de

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Rue Sigmund-Freud, Paris 19 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.221.160.114 02:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Un peu de Paris

Hello,
Cela fait bien longtemps qu'on n'a pas échangé. J'arrive encore à trouver des plaques parisiennes non encore chargées sur commons, telles que celles-ci : File:Plaque_Porte_de_la_Conférence.jpg.
Je suis assez catastrophé par la multiplication des photos de monuments très connus, le pire étant probablement la tour Eiffel.
A part ça, je vois que tu es confronté comme moi aux ayatollahs du no-FoP France...
Sur un autre point, maintenant que je suis à la retraite, je travaille comme "greeter" dans l'association Parisien d'un jour/Parisien toujours. Il s'agit d'être guide bénévole pour des visites dans Paris de très petits groupes (max 6 personnes). On peut organiser la visite qu'on veut. J'en ai trois : tour de l'ile de la Cité, tour de l'ile Saint-Louis et Montmartre (ce dernier plait aux touristes étrangers). J'en fait même en anglais. Ca permet des fois de faire des photos sous un éclairage ou des circonstances particulières, telles que la vigne de Montmartre avec des filets anti-oiseaux : File:Nets_on_Montmartre_vineyard.jpg
Je suis aussi retourné au Louvre. C'est une banalité de dire que c'est vraiment exceptionnel. Beaucoup d'oeuvres sont déjà photographiées, mais il manque quand même des oeuvres importantes, je vais peut-être faire qque chose.
Bonnes contributions.--Tangopaso (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Western Union, Avenue de Choisy, Paris 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stifle (talk) 15:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Hippolyte Taine with cat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ☎ 08:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Antonio Bertali 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rettinghaus (talk) 17:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 82.124.26.159 21:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Alfred de Falloux by André Gill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Alexandre Glais-Bizoin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Edgard Raoul-Duval by Georges Lafosse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Edgar Quinet by André Gill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Emma Valadon by Georges Lafosse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Albert de Broglie by Georges Lafosse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Charles de Rémusat by Georges Lafosse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:François Achille Bazaine by Georges Lafosse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Henri Tolain by Georges Lafosse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Hyacinthe by Georges Lafosse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Ernest Picard by Georges Lafosse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Arthur Ranc 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)