User talk:Rettinghaus
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Alfred Sittard.jpg was uncategorized on 9 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Felix Mottl 2.jpg
[edit]
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Felix Mottl 2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Felix Mottl 2.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Stefan2 (talk) 23:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Problem in VI
[edit]Excellent initiative. We need your scope is pointing to the category that contains the image I modified to Benda. You can change other scopes other scopes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- In case there is no specific category: Viewing the change in the scope syntax. (ex Carlier) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- If nothing exists you can also create the category (Abraham Megerle) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Mysliveček
[edit]Dear Rettinghaus, you have marked this picture as superseded by this picture. I do not think that is entirely warranted. The first picture is an original print published in the composer's life (1770s); the other is a romanticized engraving dating from more than a hundred years later, clearly derived from the first. It would be a pity simply to replace the more authentic and older picture by its distant copy, even if its reproduction quality is better. Of course both pictures can stay side by side.--RPekař (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Got the point! I removed the template. --Rettinghaus (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks!--RPekař (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anton Schweitzer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ercole Bernabei.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
portraits of Abraham Megerle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
portraits of Jean-Baptiste Cartier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonio Tozzi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Johann Wilhelm Häßler.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franz Benda portraits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heinrich Scheidemann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Friedrich Ernst Fesca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit].jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gottfried August Homilius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Giuseppe Tartini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferdinando Paer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Damos und Musidora.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Damos und Musidora.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Joseph Kriehuber, Ein Matinée bei Liszt, 1846.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Joseph Kriehuber, Ein Matinée bei Liszt, 1846.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Carl Ditters von Dittersdorf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Franz Danzi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Ludwig Senfl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
George Onslow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nicolas-Charles Bochsa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Adolphe Adam by Maurin.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Adolphe Adam by Maurin.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cornelius Becker.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adolphe Adam.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karl Tauchnitz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
|
File:Reger Max Postcard-1910.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
RexxS (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:IGFarbenGoetterrat.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:IGFarbenGoetterrat.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Wilhelm Friedemann Bach sketch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Rettinghaus,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Niels Gade by Georg Weinhold.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Niels Gade by Georg Weinhold.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Georg Philipp Telemann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heinrich Schütz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Johann Balthasar Lutter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Athanasius Kircher.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Giovanni Battista Viotti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlo Tessarini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tobias Clausnitzer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bird's-eye views of Berlin, late 17th century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonio Bertali.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
|
|
File:Heinrich Schenker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kosboot (talk) 21:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Johann Rist.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Christoph Christian Sturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Heinrich Wilhelm Stolze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ignaz Pleyel, engraving by William Nutter after portrait by Thomas Hardy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Notification
[edit]Hello, Please remember to notify the uploader when you nominate a file for deletion for "no source", e.g. this file. Especially when the uploader is still active on Commons, he is well placed to complete the information about where he took the file. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
|
|
File:Enrique Granados 1914 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
.jpg){kind=link}
Sguastevi (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Brockes
[edit]Moin, Sie meinen jetzt echt, dass das eine Verbesserung sei? Mit Gruß zur Nacht, --Felistoria (talk) 00:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Rettinghaus, zunächst einmal vielen Dank für das Auffinden und Hochladen von Scans, die wir bislang auf Commons noch nicht haben. Jedoch wird hier – wie unter COM:OVERWRITE erläutert – um Zurückhaltung beim unabgesprochenen Überschreiben von bereits bestehenden Dateien mit neuen Versionen gebeten. Dies ist in diesem Fall unangemessen gewesen, da es sich bei der originalen Datei um einen Scan eines Originals aus der Bibliothek des Christianeums handelt. Du hast einen weiteren Scan gefunden – von einer anderen Kopie des Druckes. Entsprechend ist es besser, diesen unter einen neuen Dateinamen hochzuladen. Ich habe jetzt File:Brockes.jpg in den vorherigen Zustand versetzt und möchte Dich daher bitten, den neuen Scan unter einem anderen Namen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Es steht Dir dann gerne frei, bei der Vorlage {{Artwork}} unter dem Feld other_versions auf den anderen Scan zu verweisen. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 06:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit],_engraving_by_Claude_Mellan_(1619).jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
,_engraving_by_Claude_Mellan_(1619).jpg){kind=link}
Portraits of Girolamo Frescobaldi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Bünau by Bernigeroth.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bünau by Bernigeroth.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Frederik Kuhlau.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frederik Kuhlau.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Gottfried Christoph Härtel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gottfried Christoph Härtel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Josef Gelinek.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Johann André.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
[edit]Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Thomas Selle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Copyright status: File:Scheller Silhouette.jpg
[edit]
Copyright status: File:Scheller Silhouette.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Scheller Silhouette.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) 22:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Busoni photograph
[edit]Dear Rettinghaus, I hope you are well. I notice that you uploaded File:FerruccioBusoni1913.jpg to Commons, but the page does not mention when and where this photograph was first published. Would you be able to provide this information? I ask since I put it in a Wikipedia article that has been nominated for Featured Article status. Many thanks for your help. All best, Toccata quarta (talk) 08:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Toccata quarta: I don't know if this has been published previously, but this scan was published in 2015 by the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin as public domain, where it is part of the Busoni bequest. --Rettinghaus (talk) 09:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Johann Adam Reincken.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Matthew Locke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Wolfgang Carl Briegel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Claude Goudimel 1562.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fortitou (talk) 10:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Fernando Sor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 |
File:Franz Stockhausen grave.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Krdbot 22:04, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:F-flat-major d-flat-minor.svg
[edit]
Copyright status: File:F-flat-major d-flat-minor.svg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:F-flat-major d-flat-minor.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nicola Cosimi, engraving by J. Smith.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Carl Keller.jpg
[edit]
Copyright status: File:Carl Keller.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Carl Keller.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Prokofiev shostakovich khachaturian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sihra 1817.png
[edit]
Copyright status: File:Sihra 1817.png
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sihra 1817.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Silvius Leopold Weiss.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Grell by Janke - Black and white.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grell by Janke - Black and white.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Giulio Regondi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.